Aksiologi Filsafat Ilmu

Tinjauan Sistematis Integrasi Nilai dalam Praktik Keilmuan Modern

Authors

  • Shintia Mulyawati UIN Imam Bonjol, Padang, Indonesia
  • Zulbaidah UIN Imam Bonjol, Padang, Indonesia
  • Efendi UIN Imam Bonjol, Padang, Indonesia
  • M. Zalnur UIN Imam Bonjol, Padang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Axiology, Philosophy of Science, Values, Scientific Ethics, Modern Scientific Practice

Abstract

This article examines the position of axiology within the philosophy of science as a normative foundation that guides the use of knowledge in the modern era, which is characterized by technological advancement and social complexity. Through a qualitative approach based on literature studies, this research explores how ethical, moral, and humanistic values are integrated into scientific practice to ensure that scientific development is not only objective but also socially responsible. The analysis indicates that modern scientific practice is never value-free; the selection of research topics, methods, and the application of scientific findings are consistently influenced by particular value orientations. The integration of values into science is essential to prevent the misuse of scientific knowledge, strengthen the responsibility of scientists, and promote innovations that prioritize human well-being. This article asserts that axiology must serve as a key pillar in the development and application of science so that scientific processes remain relevant, ethical, and positively contributive to modern life.

References

Carrier, M. (2013). Values and Objectivity in Science: Value-Ladenness, Pluralism and the Epistemic Attitude. Science and Education, 22(10), 2547–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9481-5

Diekmann, S., & Peterson, M. (2013). The Role of Non-Epistemic Values in Engineering Models. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9300-4

Erlin, E. (2018). Pandangan Aksiologi Terhadap Riset Dan Aplikasi Senjata Biologis. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 1(2), 65.

https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i2.13991

Hamdani. (2020). Al-ilmu Nurun. Al-Ibrah, 4(2), 25–45.

Heuritsch, J. (2021). Reflexive behaviour: How publication pressure affects research quality in astronomy. Publications, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9040052

Hicks, D. J., & Lobato, E. J. C. (2022). Values disclosures and trust in science: A replication study. Frontiers in Communication, 7.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.1017362

Hosnan, M., & Warits, A. (2015). aksiologi dalam dimensi filsafat. 1–21.

Jebeile, J., & Crucifix, M. (2021). Value management and model pluralism in climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 88, 120–127.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.06.004

Juairiah, J. (2020). Analisis Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi. Pustaka Karya : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 8(1), 46.

Lezi, K. (2025). Aksiologi Ilmu dalam Konteks Ilmu Pengetahuan: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 5(2), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v5i2.985

Mahfud, M. (2018). Mengenal Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi Dalam Pendidikan Islam. CENDEKIA : Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 4(1).

https://doi.org/10.37348/cendekia.v4i1.58

Marvavilha, A., & Suparlan, S. (2019). Model Integrasi Nilai Islam Dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Humanika, 18(1), 59–80.

https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v18i1.23129

Raffoul, A. W. (2023). Listen to the science! Which science? Regenerative research for times of planetary crises. Frontiers in Sustainability, 4.

https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1115238

Rosnawati, Syukri, A., Badarussyamsi, & Rizki, ahmad fadhil. (2021). Aksiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Manfaatnya Bagi Manusia. Syntax Idea, 3(11), 2457–2467.

https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v3i11.1571

Santi, Aisyah, R. D., Nadella, N., Aprilia, N. I., Febrian, M., & Harahap, S. S. A. (2023). M.J. Langeveld (Menuju ke Pemikiran Filsafat. Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3(3), 17–26.

Schniedermann, A. (2022). Shaping the Qualities, Values and Standards of Science. How Reporting Guidelines Improve the Transparency of Biomedical Research. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 7(June), 1–12.

https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.846822

Setiawan, A., Ss, ahmad syukri, & Yenti, Z. (2025). Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora ( AJSH ) Axiology of Science and Its Benefits for Humanity. 5(2).

Stamenkovic, P. (2024). Straightening the ‘value-laden turn’: minimising the influence of extra-scientific values in science. Synthese, 203(1), 1–38.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04446-2

Syafriandi, Fatimah, S., & Fitrisia, A. (2025). Aksiologi: Peran Filsafat Ilmu Dalam Transformasi Nilai Dalam Masyarakat. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 11.

https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v5i1.2512

Taubert, N., Hobert, A., Fraser, N., Jahn, N., & Iravani, E. (2019). Open Access – Towards a non-normative and systematic understanding. 1–16.

Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Sarjan, M. (2023). Tinjauan Filsafat (Aksiologi) Pendidikan Sains Masa Depan Berbasis Teknologi. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(4), 2381–2387. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i4.1650

Ward, Z. B. (2017). On “Value-Laden” Science Zina B. Ward. Rooney 1992, 1–19.

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Mulyawati, S., Zulbaidah, Efendi, & Zalnur, M. (2025). Aksiologi Filsafat Ilmu: Tinjauan Sistematis Integrasi Nilai dalam Praktik Keilmuan Modern. Islamic Studies Journal, 3(2), 109–115. Retrieved from https://jurnal.mymalewa.org/index.php/ISME/article/view/275

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.